When the President was swearing in two Supreme Court judges recently,
he declared his support for the independence of the judiciary and
pledged not to interfere with the work of the judiciary. But did he
really mean what he said? Well, let us look at the facts since then.
When Lieutenant. Bakary Camara and Superintendent Sanyang, both
presidential guards, and Momodou Lamin Sonko, proprietor of Boto
Construction, first appeared in court charged with stealing, economic
crime and conspiracy, they applied for bail but it was not granted.
However, on 14 February upon application by the presidential guards the
High Court granted the two bail. But soon after their release they were
re-arrested and have since been held at Mile Two contrary to law. Mr
Sonko was earlier granted bail but he was rearrested.
When Lt Camara
alone faced fresh charges in court on Tuesday he was again granted bail
in respect of this case as well. However, all three of them are
incarcerated at the state central prison which is meant for remand
prisoners and convicts alone.
In short the court has made its
decision based on law; it has granted bail to all defendants, a
decision to be respected by all parties. But the Executive has not
complied and has continued to incarcerate them.
Needless to say, a
judiciary can function independently and effectively not with a noose
round its neck but in an atmosphere of freedom which can inspire
unresolved judges to adjudicate impartially and independently.
That
is what Gambia needs to ensure peace and stability. It would be wishful
thinking to presume that stability rests squarely on military might.
History has countless experiences to disprove this.
To conclude,
we wish to remind the Executive of their constitutional responsibility:
“The Government and all departments and agencies of the Government
shall accord such assistance to the courts as the courts may reasonably
require to protect their independence, dignity and effectiveness.”
Src: Foroyaa, Gambia